John Leonard Vs. Pepsi Co Case Study Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 750 words

John Leonard Vs. Pepsi Co - Case Study Example found on this information, it is easy to conclude that there was no written agreement between the two parties. Furthermore, on effective grounds, the advertisement cannot substantiate the plaintiffs claim that an poke out was made. On these grounds, PepsiCo is liable for nothing.The future(a) question is whether Pepsi actually made an offer. When you take such postulates into consideration, it creates a lot of ambiguity about the commercialized being an actual offer. In the catalog that PepsiCo issued, the jet was not included as one of the gifts which could be collected. Thus the ad was not an offer, largely because it was not included in the Pepsi Stuff Catalogue that provides further information about the Pepsi Points program. Furthermore, the law on such issues is that if an offer is made that is clearly meant to be a joke and interpreted as such by an objective standard it does not constitute a binding offer. Thus, PepsiCo agai n is safe on these grounds. However, John Leonard interpreted the ad as an actual offer and tried to capitalize on it. Based on our conclusion, the plaintiffs understanding of the commercial as an offer should be rejected because the courts would find that no objective person could reasonably have reason out that the commercial actually offered consumers a reward of a Harrier Jet.Moving on to the infamous look for made by Leonard regarding the details of the offer, he was informed about the procedure of amassing Pepsi points, and at no clip was he corroborated that he would receive a Harrier Jet. PepsiCo had already put this in writing in its catalog, both on how to gather points and what would be up for grabs. Hence, Leonards call seems to have no legal significance except for that fact that they imply a favor in Pepsis camp.But lets adopt a new vantage point, one that reflects the views of the plaintiff.